Nevada Employment Classification for Business Owners: Avoiding Costly IRS and State Penalties

Hiring workers as independent contractors can provide businesses with flexibility. Companies may use contractors for specialized projects, temporary assignments, consulting services, technology work, construction, marketing, and other business needs.

However, simply calling someone an “independent contractor” does not necessarily make that person one.

For Nevada business owners, worker classification can involve different legal tests for different purposes. Federal tax rules administered by the IRS generally examine the degree of control and independence in the relationship. Nevada unemployment law uses its own statutory framework, including an ABC-style test for purposes of unemployment compensation, while Nevada wage and labor laws contain additional classification rules and statutory provisions.

This means a business cannot safely rely on a worker’s job title, a 1099 form, or an independent-contractor agreement alone.

Misclassification can expose a business to unpaid payroll taxes, unemployment insurance obligations, wage claims, workers’ compensation issues, penalties, interest, and other legal consequences. Nevada’s Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation specifically warns that employee misclassification can result in significant penalties for failure to report wages and pay unemployment insurance taxes.

Understanding the applicable classification rules before hiring workers can help Nevada businesses reduce unnecessary legal and financial risk.

What Is Employee Misclassification?

Employee misclassification generally occurs when a business treats a worker as an independent contractor even though the applicable legal test requires the worker to be treated as an employee.

The distinction matters because employees and independent contractors are treated differently for tax, wage, unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation, and other legal purposes.

For federal employment tax purposes, the IRS explains that businesses must examine the actual relationship between the worker and the business. The IRS considers evidence involving behavioral control, financial control, and the type of relationship between the parties.

Nevada’s rules can involve additional considerations depending on which law is being applied.

This is why a business owner should not ask only, “Did we sign an independent contractor agreement?”

The more important question is:

How does the relationship actually operate?

---

Why Worker Classification Matters

Classification affects much more than how a business issues a tax form.

If a worker is an employee, the business may have obligations involving payroll withholding, employer payroll taxes, unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation, wage and hour requirements, and other employment protections.

The IRS generally requires employers to withhold federal income tax and Social Security and Medicare taxes from employee wages and pay the employer’s share of Social Security and Medicare taxes. Employers generally also have federal unemployment tax obligations for employees.

Nevada employers may also have state obligations relating to unemployment insurance and other employment laws.

DETR explains that employee misclassification can result in unpaid unemployment insurance taxes and can also affect obligations concerning minimum wage, overtime, workers’ compensation, temporary disability insurance, wage payment, and payroll taxes.

A classification error affecting one worker may appear manageable. A classification practice affecting an entire category of workers can become substantially more expensive.

---

The IRS Test: Control and Independence

For federal employment tax purposes, the IRS generally looks at the complete relationship rather than relying on one factor.

The IRS groups relevant evidence into three broad categories:

Behavioral Control

This concerns whether the business has the right to direct and control how the worker performs the work.

Relevant factors may include:

• Instructions about when and where work is performed.
• Instructions concerning tools or equipment.
• Direction regarding work methods.
• Training provided by the business.
• Evaluation systems.
• Required procedures.

The IRS emphasizes that actual supervision is not always necessary. The business’s right to control the details of the work can be relevant.

Financial Control

The IRS also considers the financial and business aspects of the relationship.

Relevant factors can include:

• The worker’s investment in equipment.
• Unreimbursed business expenses.
• Opportunity for profit or loss.
• Whether the worker markets services to others.
• The method of payment.

An independent contractor generally operates an independent business and may have the opportunity to make a profit or suffer a loss.

However, no single factor automatically determines classification. The IRS specifically states that the entire relationship must be evaluated.

---

Type of Relationship

The IRS also considers the relationship between the parties.

Relevant considerations include:

• Written contracts.
• Employee benefits.
• Permanency of the relationship.
• Whether the worker performs a key aspect of the company’s regular business.

A written agreement identifying someone as an independent contractor is relevant evidence, but it is not conclusive.

The IRS expressly states that the label used in a contract does not determine worker status. The actual working relationship controls.

---

Nevada Uses Its Own Classification Rules

Nevada business owners should be particularly careful about assuming that the federal IRS analysis answers every classification question.

For Nevada unemployment compensation purposes, DETR states that Nevada uses an ABC-style test. The employer generally must establish all three applicable conditions for independent-contractor treatment:

1. The worker is free from control or direction in performing the services.
2. The service is outside the usual course of the business or performed outside all places of business of the enterprise.
3. The worker is engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business of the same nature as the service performed.

This distinction is important.

A worker may satisfy some factors under one classification framework but still require different treatment under another applicable law.

Businesses should therefore evaluate worker classification based on the specific legal obligation involved.

---

A Contract Alone Does Not Create Independent-Contractor Status

One of the most common mistakes Nevada business owners make is assuming that an independent-contractor agreement solves the classification issue.

It does not.

Nevada DETR expressly states that a written contract, by itself, does not establish independent-contractor status for unemployment insurance purposes.

The same basic principle applies under federal tax classification: the IRS considers the substance of the relationship rather than simply accepting the label chosen by the parties.

For example, an agreement may state that a worker is an independent contractor while the business:

• Sets the worker’s daily schedule.
• Requires detailed instructions about how work must be performed.
• Provides all equipment.
• Requires ongoing training.
• Prohibits the worker from serving other clients.
• Treats the worker like an ordinary employee.

Those facts may create classification concerns regardless of what the contract says.

---

Common Classification Mistakes by Nevada Businesses

Businesses frequently encounter problems when they treat classification as a paperwork exercise.

Common mistakes include:

• Automatically classifying every 1099 worker as an independent contractor.
• Assuming an LLC automatically makes a worker an independent contractor.
• Using the same contractor agreement for every type of worker.
• Controlling contractors like employees.
• Providing employee benefits while treating workers as contractors.
• Requiring contractors to work indefinitely with no independent business.
• Failing to review classification when a worker’s role changes.
• Assuming part-time workers are automatically contractors.
• Relying on how other businesses classify similar workers.

The IRS specifically notes that classification is not determined simply by whether someone works part-time or full-time, how often they are paid, or how they are paid.

---

Why Misclassification Can Become Expensive

A classification problem can affect multiple areas simultaneously.

If a worker who should have been classified as an employee was treated as an independent contractor, a business may face questions involving:

• Federal employment taxes.
• Federal income-tax withholding.
• Social Security and Medicare taxes.
• Federal unemployment taxes.
• Nevada unemployment insurance.
• Minimum wage.
• Overtime.
• Workers’ compensation.
• Wage payment requirements.
• Other employment obligations.

The IRS states that a business that misclassifies an employee as an independent contractor may become liable for employment taxes, subject to applicable relief provisions.

Nevada DETR likewise identifies significant penalties associated with failure to properly report wages and pay unemployment insurance taxes.

---

Nevada Penalties for Willful Misclassification

Nevada law also addresses intentional worker misclassification.

NRS 608.400 prohibits an employer from using coercion, misrepresentation, or fraud to require a person to be classified as an independent contractor or to form a business entity for that purpose. The statute also prohibits willfully misclassifying or otherwise willfully failing to properly classify a person as an independent contractor.

For a second or subsequent offense, the statute provides for an administrative penalty of $5,000 for each employee who was willfully misclassified, subject to the statutory procedures and findings required before the penalty is imposed.

This makes classification more than an accounting issue. In certain circumstances, it can become a significant employment-law compliance problem.

Understanding Nevada’s ABC Test

For Nevada unemployment compensation purposes, independent-contractor classification involves a statutory framework that differs from the federal IRS analysis.

Nevada’s unemployment compensation law generally requires an employer to establish that the worker satisfies the applicable independent-contractor requirements. The analysis focuses on whether the worker is free from control or direction, whether the services fall outside the usual course of the business or are performed outside the business’s places of operation, and whether the worker operates an independently established business of the same nature as the services being performed.

These requirements can create difficult classification questions for businesses.

For example, a marketing agency that hires an independent graphic designer may have a stronger argument for contractor status if the designer operates an independent business, serves multiple clients, controls how the work is performed, and operates independently from the agency.

By contrast, a worker who performs the company’s ordinary business activities under substantial direction may create greater classification risk.

Because the test is statutory and fact-specific, Nevada businesses should evaluate the actual relationship rather than relying on a job title.

---

Control Is a Major Classification Warning Sign

One of the clearest indicators that a contractor may actually function as an employee is the degree of control exercised by the business.

A business should examine whether it controls:

• When the worker performs services.
• Where the worker performs services.
• How the worker performs the work.
• What tools or equipment are used.
• What procedures must be followed.
• Whether the worker must attend regular meetings.
• Whether the worker receives detailed training.
• How the worker’s performance is evaluated.

Control does not automatically establish employee status. Businesses can impose reasonable contractual requirements without necessarily creating an employment relationship.

The issue is the overall degree and nature of control.

For federal tax purposes, the IRS specifically considers whether the business has the right to direct and control the worker, including behavioral and financial aspects of the relationship.

---

Why a 1099 Does Not Automatically Make Someone a Contractor

Many business owners believe that issuing Form 1099-NEC solves classification issues.

It does not.

A 1099 is primarily a reporting mechanism. It does not determine whether a worker is legally an independent contractor.

Similarly, a worker signing an independent-contractor agreement does not automatically establish contractor status.

The actual relationship remains important.

For example, a business could issue a worker a 1099 while requiring the person to work fixed hours, follow employee-style procedures, receive extensive supervision, and perform the company’s core operations.

Those facts can create classification concerns even though the business treats the worker as a contractor for tax reporting.

---

Workers’ Compensation Considerations

Worker classification can also affect workers’ compensation obligations.

Nevada businesses should evaluate whether workers are covered by applicable workers’ compensation requirements rather than assuming that contractor status eliminates every obligation.

This is particularly important in industries involving physical work, construction, transportation, property maintenance, and other activities where workplace injuries may create substantial exposure.

A business should also review whether its insurance policies and contractual arrangements accurately reflect the people performing work for the company.

If a worker is incorrectly classified and suffers an injury, the business may face questions involving insurance coverage, employment status, and potential liability.

---

Unemployment Insurance and Worker Classification

Nevada employers should also consider unemployment insurance obligations when determining worker classification.

Nevada DETR administers the state’s unemployment insurance system and has authority to examine whether workers have been properly classified for unemployment purposes.

If workers who should have been reported as employees are treated as independent contractors, the business may face assessments for unpaid unemployment insurance taxes and related penalties.

The financial exposure can become particularly significant when the same classification has been applied to multiple workers over an extended period.

A business that uses a large contractor workforce should therefore periodically review its classification practices rather than waiting for an agency inquiry or worker complaint.

---

Employee Status Can Affect Wage and Hour Obligations

Misclassification can also create wage-and-hour exposure.

Employees may have rights relating to minimum wage, overtime, meal and rest periods, wage payments, and other employment requirements depending on the applicable law and circumstances.

Independent contractors generally do not receive the same treatment under employment laws.

If a worker is incorrectly treated as a contractor, the business may later face claims concerning compensation that should have been paid under applicable employment requirements.

The potential exposure can become much larger when multiple workers perform substantially similar roles under the same classification policy.

---

Red Flags That May Indicate Employee Status

Nevada business owners should review their classification practices when several of the following characteristics are present.

The Worker Performs the Company’s Core Business

If a worker performs the same services that the business routinely sells to customers, the classification should be examined carefully.

The Business Sets the Work Schedule

A business exercising significant control over when and how a person works may have greater classification risk.

The Business Provides Equipment

Providing all or most of the tools and equipment can be relevant to the classification analysis.

The Worker Has No Other Clients

An independent business will often have the ability to provide services to multiple customers.

Exclusivity is not automatically determinative, but it can be relevant when considered with other factors.

The Relationship Is Indefinite

A continuing relationship with no defined project or endpoint can be another factor worth examining.

The Worker Receives Employee Benefits

Benefits such as health insurance, paid leave, retirement benefits, or other employee-style benefits can be relevant to the federal classification analysis.

The Business Provides Extensive Training

Training a worker in exactly how to perform the services can indicate a higher degree of behavioral control.

No single factor determines classification. The entire relationship must be evaluated.

---

How Nevada Businesses Can Audit Worker Classifications

A classification audit can help identify potential problems before they become government assessments or employment disputes.

The first step is to create a list of all workers currently treated as independent contractors.

For each worker, the business should review:

1. The written agreement.
2. The worker’s actual responsibilities.
3. How the worker is paid.
4. Who controls the work schedule.
5. Who provides tools and equipment.
6. Whether the worker serves other clients.
7. Whether the worker operates an independent business.
8. Whether the relationship is project-based or indefinite.
9. Whether the worker receives benefits.
10. Whether the worker performs a core function of the business.

The business should then compare the actual relationship against the classification standards applicable to the particular issue.

This review should be documented.

If a company discovers that its written agreement does not match the actual working relationship, simply editing the contract may not resolve the underlying problem.

The business may need to change how the relationship operates.

---

What If a Business Discovers Possible Misclassification?

Discovering a classification problem does not necessarily mean that the business should immediately terminate every contractor or retroactively change every record.

The appropriate response depends on the scope and nature of the issue.

A business should first determine:

• Which workers may be affected.
• How long the classification has been used.
• Which laws and agencies may be involved.
• Whether unpaid taxes or insurance obligations exist.
• Whether wage claims may exist.
• Whether workers have already complained.
• Whether an agency investigation is pending.
• Whether the business has received a government notice.
• Whether the existing contracts contain relevant provisions.

A legal and accounting review can then help determine the appropriate corrective approach.

---

IRS Classification Determinations

When a business is uncertain about a worker’s federal classification, the IRS provides Form SS-8, which allows the IRS to determine whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor for federal employment tax purposes.

Either a worker or a business can generally submit Form SS-8 to request an IRS determination. However, the process can take substantial time, so businesses should not treat it as an emergency solution for every classification question.

The IRS also provides correction programs in certain circumstances.

For example, the Voluntary Classification Settlement Program (VCSP) may allow eligible taxpayers to voluntarily reclassify workers as employees for future tax periods with partial relief from certain federal employment tax liabilities. Eligibility requirements apply.

Businesses considering the VCSP should review the current IRS requirements before applying.

---

Correcting Classification Before a Dispute Escalates

If a business determines that a worker should be classified differently, correcting the relationship proactively may reduce future exposure.

Possible steps may include:

• Reviewing the worker’s agreement.
• Changing the actual working relationship.
• Reclassifying the worker as an employee where appropriate.
• Reviewing payroll records.
• Addressing unemployment insurance obligations.
• Reviewing workers’ compensation coverage.
• Evaluating potential wage-and-hour exposure.
• Correcting tax reporting where required.
• Updating onboarding procedures.
• Reviewing other workers performing similar roles.

The appropriate corrective process should be determined based on the specific circumstances.

A business should avoid making retroactive changes to records simply to create the appearance that a worker was properly classified.

---

Do Not Assume an LLC or Corporation Makes a Worker a Contractor

Another common misconception is that a worker automatically becomes an independent contractor by forming an LLC.

The existence of a separate business entity can be relevant to certain classification analyses, but it does not automatically determine the worker’s status.

If a worker forms an LLC but continues performing services under substantial control and in an employee-like relationship, the underlying classification issue may remain.

Businesses should therefore evaluate the substance of the relationship rather than relying on the worker’s business structure alone.

What Should a Business Do After Discovering Possible Misclassification?

Discovering that workers may have been incorrectly classified does not necessarily mean that a business should immediately terminate its contractors or change every payroll record.

The first step should be to determine the scope of the issue.

Business owners should identify:

• Which workers may be affected.
• How long they have been classified as contractors.
• Whether other workers perform substantially similar duties.
• How the workers are actually supervised.
• Which agreements and policies apply.
• Whether payroll taxes were reported consistently.
• Whether unemployment insurance requirements were satisfied.
• Whether workers have raised complaints.
• Whether a government agency has contacted the company.
• Whether potential wage, benefits, or workers’ compensation issues exist.

This review should distinguish between an isolated classification issue and a company-wide practice.

A business that has classified an entire category of workers incorrectly may face substantially different exposure from a company that discovers one questionable relationship.

---

What Happens During a Worker Classification Audit?

Worker classification can be examined by different government authorities for different purposes.

The IRS may examine classification for federal employment tax purposes. Nevada agencies may examine classification for purposes such as unemployment insurance or state labor requirements.

These reviews do not necessarily apply identical tests.

The IRS currently evaluates the overall relationship using behavioral control, financial control, and the type of relationship between the parties.

Nevada unemployment law separately provides that services performed for wages are generally deemed employment unless the employer establishes the statutory requirements for independent-contractor treatment.

A business should therefore avoid assuming that a determination by one authority automatically resolves every other classification issue.

---

Government Notices Should Be Taken Seriously

If a business receives a notice concerning worker classification, unemployment insurance, payroll taxes, or employment practices, management should not simply ignore it or respond without reviewing the underlying facts.

The company should determine:

1. Which agency issued the notice.
2. Which workers or periods are covered.
3. What classification issue is being questioned.
4. What records the agency is requesting.
5. When the response is due.
6. Whether an appeal or hearing right exists.
7. Whether the issue could affect other workers.

Deadlines can be important.

The company should preserve relevant records and coordinate its response with appropriate legal and accounting professionals.

---

Potential Federal Tax Consequences

If the IRS determines that workers were employees rather than independent contractors, the business may face federal employment tax obligations.

Generally, employers are responsible for withholding and paying applicable employment taxes for employees, including federal income-tax withholding and Social Security and Medicare taxes, along with applicable federal unemployment tax obligations.

The IRS explains that a business that treated an employee as an independent contractor without a reasonable basis may become liable for employment taxes, subject to applicable relief provisions.

The financial impact can increase when the classification has continued for multiple years or involves a large group of workers.

Businesses should therefore address potential classification problems before they become larger tax liabilities.

---

IRS Section 530 Relief May Be Relevant in Some Cases

Federal law provides a potential employment-tax relief provision under Section 530 for certain businesses that have treated workers as independent contractors.

However, the requirements are specific.

Among other requirements, the business generally must have a reasonable basis for the classification and must satisfy reporting and consistency requirements. The IRS explains that Section 530 relief does not itself determine that the worker is an independent contractor; rather, it can provide relief from certain federal employment-tax liabilities when the statutory requirements are satisfied.

This is one reason businesses should not assume that correcting records or changing a worker’s classification automatically resolves historical tax exposure.

A tax professional and business attorney should evaluate whether a particular relief provision actually applies.

---

The Voluntary Classification Settlement Program

For eligible businesses that want to prospectively reclassify workers as employees, the IRS offers the Voluntary Classification Settlement Program (VCSP).

The program allows qualifying taxpayers to voluntarily change the federal employment-tax treatment of workers going forward while receiving partial relief from certain federal employment taxes for prior periods.

Eligibility requirements apply.

For example, the IRS generally requires the taxpayer to have consistently treated the workers as independent contractors and filed required Forms 1099 for the preceding three years. The taxpayer also cannot currently be under an employment-tax audit by the IRS or under a relevant worker-classification audit by the Department of Labor or a state government agency.

Eligible businesses accepted into the VCSP generally pay an amount calculated under the program and agree to treat the applicable workers as employees going forward. The IRS states that the program provides relief from certain interest and penalties associated with the covered prior-period employment-tax liability.

Because eligibility and application requirements can change, businesses should review the current IRS requirements before relying on the program.

---

Nevada Consequences Can Extend Beyond Taxes

Worker classification is not merely an IRS issue.

A Nevada business should also consider potential consequences involving state unemployment insurance, wage-and-hour requirements, workers’ compensation, and other employment obligations.

Nevada law specifically addresses willful misclassification. NRS 608.400 prohibits an employer from using coercion, misrepresentation, or fraud to require a person to be classified as an independent contractor and also prohibits willfully misclassifying or otherwise willfully failing to properly classify a person as an independent contractor.

The consequences can therefore extend beyond correcting a tax form.

Businesses should evaluate the full scope of potential exposure when a classification problem is discovered.

---

When Should a Contractor Become an Employee?

There is no universal point at which every contractor must be converted to an employee.

The decision should be based on the actual relationship and the applicable classification standards.

A business should consider reassessing the relationship when:

• The worker becomes a permanent part of the business.
• The company begins controlling the worker’s schedule.
• The business provides extensive training.
• The worker becomes dependent on the company for most or all income.
• The worker performs an essential ongoing business function.
• The business provides most tools and equipment.
• The worker no longer operates an independent business.
• The relationship becomes substantially different from the original project arrangement.

A contractor relationship that was appropriate when a worker was hired for a six-week project may no longer be appropriate after the person becomes a long-term member of the company’s day-to-day operations.

---

How to Structure Future Independent-Contractor Relationships

Businesses that legitimately use independent contractors should make sure the contract reflects the actual relationship.

A strong contractor agreement should address matters such as:

• Scope of services.
• Project deliverables.
• Payment terms.
• Invoicing.
• Ownership of work product.
• Confidentiality.
• Intellectual property.
• Insurance.
• Business expenses.
• Independent-business responsibilities.
• Termination.
• Dispute resolution.

However, contract language should not be designed simply to create the appearance of independence.

The operational relationship should support the contractual terms.

For example, if a company intends to engage a contractor for a defined project, it should avoid unnecessarily managing the individual in the same manner as an employee.

The IRS emphasizes that worker classification depends on the substance of the relationship and the degree of control and independence, rather than simply the label used by the parties.

Build a Worker Classification Policy

Growing businesses should consider creating an internal classification procedure.

Before engaging a worker as an independent contractor, management should document:

Why the worker is being engaged

Identify the specific business need and scope of services.

Why contractor status is appropriate

Document the relevant facts supporting independent-business status.

How the relationship will operate

Define the expected degree of independence without creating unnecessary employee-style control.

What documentation is required

Maintain the agreement, invoices, business-license information where relevant, insurance information, tax documentation, and other appropriate records.

When classification will be reviewed

Reassess the relationship if the worker’s responsibilities or working conditions materially change.

This creates a repeatable process rather than leaving classification decisions to individual managers.

---

Keep Classification Documentation Consistent

A business should ensure that its records tell the same story.

For example, if the contract says that a worker controls the manner and means of performing services but internal company records show that a manager assigns the worker daily tasks and requires fixed hours, the inconsistency can create problems.

Businesses should therefore periodically compare:

• Contracts.
• Invoices.
• Payment records.
• Emails.
• Scheduling systems.
• Employee handbooks.
• Management instructions.
• Performance reviews.
• Benefits records.

The objective is to ensure that the company’s documentation reflects the actual relationship.

When Should a Nevada Business Seek Legal Advice?

Legal review is particularly important when:

• A worker disputes their classification.
• Multiple workers are classified as contractors.
• A government agency has initiated an inquiry.
• The business receives an unemployment-insurance notice.
• The IRS questions worker classification.
• A former contractor threatens a wage claim.
• The company is considering reclassifying workers.
• The business wants to use contractors for core business functions.
• A contractor relationship has changed significantly.
• The company is acquiring another business and inheriting its workforce.

Early review can help identify whether the problem is isolated or systemic and whether corrective action should address historical as well as future exposure.

Frequently Asked Questions

About Milan Chatterjee

This article was prepared by Milan Chatterjee, a Nevada and California licensed attorney and founder of Best Business Lawyer, the dedicated business law practice of Milan Legal.

Milan advises Nevada entrepreneurs, startups, closely held businesses, and established companies on business contracts, employment-related business issues, worker classification, commercial disputes, corporate governance, business formation, and ongoing legal counsel.

He earned his Juris Doctor from UCLA School of Law and studied at New York University School of Law as a visiting student. Before entering private practice, he served as Associate Compliance Counsel at Las Vegas Sands Corporation, where he advised on commercial transactions, regulatory compliance, corporate governance, enterprise risk management, and complex business operations.

Through Best Business Lawyer and Milan Legal, Milan helps Nevada businesses identify legal risks, structure commercial relationships, develop compliant business practices, and protect their operations as they grow.

Conclusion

Employee classification is an important compliance issue for Nevada business owners.

A worker’s title, payment method, 1099 form, or independent-contractor agreement does not automatically determine legal status. The actual relationship between the business and the worker must be evaluated under the applicable legal framework.

For federal tax purposes, the IRS examines behavioral control, financial control, and the relationship between the parties. Nevada applies its own statutory requirements for unemployment compensation and has separate provisions addressing willful worker misclassification.

Businesses should therefore periodically audit their contractor relationships, particularly when workers perform core business functions or have become integrated into ordinary operations.

If a classification problem is discovered, the business should preserve records, determine the scope of the issue, evaluate federal and Nevada obligations, and consider whether corrective programs or other remedies may apply.

For businesses that legitimately use independent contractors, the strongest approach is to structure the relationship around genuine independence and maintain documentation that accurately reflects how the relationship operates.

Proper classification is not simply a payroll decision. It is part of a broader employment, tax, contract, and risk-management strategy.